Mnyb wrote: > Yes I have a new router , however the old Squeezebox Touch OP is using > is only compatible with older wifi standards and thus not as fast as one > would like , besides squeezebox wifi have never been on top off things > . > > So the 2003 aproach still has merit when using old original squeezbox > hardware . > > And i also have the 1990 pow that stationary equipment can/should be > wired as they dont move and the wire will always fit , why a complicated > radio sulotion for estethic or lazyness reasons ? :)
This is an academic exercise, since we knew from the first post that 192/24 would be at the limits of the Touch with a wireless connection. The curiousity lay in as smuch why some of the 192 files worked as much as the one that failed as failure was expected. If the OP really wanted a wireless connection then I think something like a nano/travel router (e.g. tplink wr802 for 802.11 or wr902 for dual band) acting as a Client (i.e. wireless to Ethernet) might work at relatively low cost since the Touch can handle 192 on a wired connection. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109917 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
