On 06/30/2012 06:10 PM, David Seikel wrote: >>> And people will scream if I leave out emacs. shrugs >> >> I honestly don't care, but if it's easy to do... > > I don't care about emacs or vi, but vi is apparently mandatory, though > hideous,
It's in posix, and is the only text editor that is unless you count "ed". That means I'd need a reason _not_ to do it. (I might eventually wind up doing ed, since sed is halfway there...) > and basic emacs should be trivial, with a full emacs being > more hideous. Simple emacs, yep easy to do, could almost do it now. > Microemacs subset, most likely I'll do it. Full emacs, not gonna > happen. Microemacs is what Linus uses, apparently. That probably makes it a reasonable target: http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/uemacs/ Rob -- GNU/Linux isn't: Linux=GPLv2, GNU=GPLv3+, they can't share code. Either it's "mere aggregation", or a license violation. Pick one. _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
