Stephen,

This might help with the M4 issue:

http://haddonthethird.net/m4/

I know it works on musl; don't know about PCC. I haven't been working 
on Linux distro stuff for a while, so basically no one is using or 
maintaining this, but if you find a bug I'll fix it.

Hope that helps,
William Haddon

On 12/18/2014 03:03:48 PM, stephen Turner wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > If somebody, somewhere, can build a linux kernel with pcc (even a
> mostly
> > allnoconfig one with extensive patching applied, ala the old 
> tccboot
> > iso), I'll take a second look at it.
> >
> > Last I checked it was down to one part-time developer who only 
> cared
> > about bsd and not linux, but I'm told it's revived a bit since
> then...
> >
> >
> Rob, back to this conversation. PCC is only a c compiler but that
> being
> said i have compiled everything in the PCC-Musl env except m4 and the
> kernel. I know qcc is a If and after toybox-1.0 this conversation is 
> a
> hypothetical more or less.
> 
> From what i have been reading and running into thus far it appears 
> the
> kernel is written with the explicit assumption that it is and always
> will
> be compiled with gcc. GCC specifically is called within scripts and
> possibly code.
> 
> Back when you were working on or thinking about the QCC project did
> this
> ever come up and if so how would it be handled theoretically? Would
> QCC
> handle it or would kernel patches be proposed and pushed upstream?
> 
> 
> thanks,
> stephen
> 

------quoted attachment------
> _______________________________________________
> Toybox mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
> 


_______________________________________________
Toybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net

Reply via email to