Dude thats awesome! whats better is the licensing pulls me farther away
from gpl (while not a requirement its a big bonus!) (i would prefer all bsd
licensed for ease of mind)

pcc is a plain jane c compiler. i dont anticipate any issues but im
definitely going to give this a test!  I bet that only leaves the kernel to
be resolved.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:26 PM, William Haddon <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Stephen,
>
> This might help with the M4 issue:
>
> http://haddonthethird.net/m4/
>
> I know it works on musl; don't know about PCC. I haven't been working
> on Linux distro stuff for a while, so basically no one is using or
> maintaining this, but if you find a bug I'll fix it.
>
> Hope that helps,
> William Haddon
>
> On 12/18/2014 03:03:48 PM, stephen Turner wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If somebody, somewhere, can build a linux kernel with pcc (even a
> > mostly
> > > allnoconfig one with extensive patching applied, ala the old
> > tccboot
> > > iso), I'll take a second look at it.
> > >
> > > Last I checked it was down to one part-time developer who only
> > cared
> > > about bsd and not linux, but I'm told it's revived a bit since
> > then...
> > >
> > >
> > Rob, back to this conversation. PCC is only a c compiler but that
> > being
> > said i have compiled everything in the PCC-Musl env except m4 and the
> > kernel. I know qcc is a If and after toybox-1.0 this conversation is
> > a
> > hypothetical more or less.
> >
> > From what i have been reading and running into thus far it appears
> > the
> > kernel is written with the explicit assumption that it is and always
> > will
> > be compiled with gcc. GCC specifically is called within scripts and
> > possibly code.
> >
> > Back when you were working on or thinking about the QCC project did
> > this
> > ever come up and if so how would it be handled theoretically? Would
> > QCC
> > handle it or would kernel patches be proposed and pushed upstream?
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> > stephen
> >
>
> ------quoted attachment------
> > _______________________________________________
> > Toybox mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Toybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net

Reply via email to