On 04/23/2016 06:45 PM, dmccunney wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 6:38 PM, enh <[email protected]> wrote: >> yeah, i'm pretty sure 100% of our more(1) users are using because we >> don't have less. > > I'd be inclined to say "Don't bother with more as a short term fix. > Properly implement less, and symlink it to more." Since you have an > implementation of more your folks are using, it's not like they are > left with nothing while they wait.
I wasn't going to, but I got an external contribution and I try hard not to be more of a bottleneck than necessary... Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list [email protected] http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
