On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 9:36 PM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote:
> On 5/14/23 23:47, Rob Landley wrote: > > So after some head scratching and false starts, what I'm currently > leaning > > towards doing is: > > > > 1) add units to ulimit like you did. > > 2) keep prlimit mostly like ulimit, but have it show/accept bytes. > > 3) have prlimit with no arguments default to -a (show all) > > 4) Add the HARD:SOFT parsing (to both). Keep ulimit's no-colon default > to soft > > and make prlimit's no-colon default be "both". > > 5) Remove the multi-argument exclusions, go ahead and output all the > enabled > > ones (with -a enabling all), but output them in alphabetical order > instead of > > command line order. (This means the ulimit -c -c -c thing... ain't > gonna?) > > 6) Maybe add -B to ulimit for "bytes" and poke Chet. :) > i'd be curious to hear his opinions on things like "8m" anyway. just knowing that toybox pretty much always accepts that is for me one of the things i like most about the toybox implementations of things. i love bytes for machine-machine communication, and i hate _implicit_ scaling, but i love being able to just throw in a k/m/g wherever... > Rob >
_______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
