thanks! (and apologies yet again that i never remember your name... i suck at names!)
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023, 13:19 Eric Molitor <emoli...@molitor.org> wrote: > I can take a look this weekend. > > - Eric > > On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, 8:32 pm enh via Toybox, <toybox@lists.landley.net> > wrote: > >> heh, and the revert commit _did_ get a green ci run. so, yeah, definitely >> bad. but now we need the guy who set up the github ci in the first place to >> hit us with his cluestick... :-) (how is a failure to parse not a red cross >> with a link to logs, just like if it parsed but the _actions_ failed?! >> madness!) >> >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 12:08 PM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote: >> >>> On 7/20/23 09:07, enh wrote: >>> > at this point, i'm pretty sure that change silently broke it --- i've >>> never seen >>> > a gap without runs over this many changes, or this amount of time. >>> > >>> > revert >>> https://github.com/landley/toybox/commit/c45e800803364c6e1f343e431f98e19a1bc1148f >>> ? >>> >>> Done. >>> >>> I wonder if github has some sort of silent failure parsing its config >>> file, >>> which doesn't show up as a failed run because it never launched the run? >>> (Where >>> does failure to parse the config file get logged?) >>> >>> Rob >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Toybox mailing list >> Toybox@lists.landley.net >> http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net >> >
_______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
