On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:59 PM Rob Landley <r...@landley.net> wrote: > > On 10/4/23 13:51, enh via Toybox wrote: > > (since it looks like there are folks actively working on vi atm...) > > > > looks like 'b' goes to the _end_ of the _previous_ word, rather than > > the beginning of the current word? > > There's no 'b' but there is a "b" (which is weird because all the vi_mov_param > are chars so why is that a string) which dispatches to vi_movb() which is > multiplying count0 by count1. What ARE count0 and count1? The only caller of > vi_movs[] is run_vi_command() which is passing in TT.count0 and TT.count1 as > global variables, which are only ever used locally in vi_run_command(), and > which are initialized to 0 at the start of the function and then that's > assigned > over without ever being used by TT.count0 = val 11 lines later (assuming > strtol() didn't use the value, we didn't call any other functions)... > > And I'm backing slowly away from this Thing That Needs Focus To Clean Up. > Gotta > close the open cans of worms first, thanks...
yeah, this seemed like it would be an easy fix, but i gave up and just mailed the list at that same point :-) > Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
