On 10/6/23 05:05, Rob Landley wrote: > Apparently the widest unicode characters are: > > 1. ﷽ > > 2. 𒐫 > > 3. 𒈙 > > 4. ⸻ > > 5. ꧅ > > The first 4 of which xfce's terminal does NOT like. And thunderbird fits the > first one in 3 columns while vim's giving it... 9 I think.
And trying to add a file with those to the test suite, neither glibc nor musl is returning wcwidth() for them (it's all 1). And washing the attempt through ltrace it looks like their unicode code points aren't defined in https://www.w3.org/TR/xml-entity-names/1D7.html and friends. Which is odd because the web browser and terminal and so on render them properly. But if neither glibc nor musl can handle them, I can't add "fold" tests for them, can I? (Haven't tried bionic, but possibly this is what Elliott meant when said he used a bigger gui library for this sort of thing...) Rob _______________________________________________ Toybox mailing list Toybox@lists.landley.net http://lists.landley.net/listinfo.cgi/toybox-landley.net
