On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:59:49AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>    Stefan Berger/Watson/IBM@IBMUS wrote on 09/12/2016 11:15:34 AM:
> 
>    >
>    > Patch 4b68112 seems like an unlikely candidate for such a failure,
>    > nevertheless that's what I am seeing: 'Could not get TPM timeouts
>    > and durations'.
> 
>    Actually, the patch seems to be quite broken. tpm_cmd is being read from
>    after calling tpm1_getcap_cmd(), but tpm_cmd is not passed to that
>    function, so it wasn't touched. I am not sure how this was intended to
>    work and where the check for the returned size was going to be done.

I will drop this commit. My bad. I looked my only test machine with
TPM 1.x and the commit was not applied in the test kernel.

I'll resend this after the pull request after I've done proper testing.
Can you check it out then?

Thanks.

/Jarkko

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
tpmdd-devel mailing list
tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel

Reply via email to