On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 06:11:41PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 02:24:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 05:00:11PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > > > I have a 4th Gen Core NUC where I experienced this issue. It reported > > > > > requiring only ACPI start but actually required ACPI + CRB start. The > > > > > comment could have been better. > > > > Shouldn't bios work arounds be keyed on something? What happens if a > > system rolls around that cannot do ACPI + CRB start? How does this > > system work in windows? > > I didn't find anything better to key it on at the time and it has been > working for two years now without any problems.
I've though about this and came to conclusion that maybe I won't apply this patch because it is good to keep this robustness in for now. I think your point is valid. /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise? Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy! http://sdm.link/telerik _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
