On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:32:44PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:55:20AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:14:51PM +0000, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > I was able to apply the patch after manually editing the mbox file. > > > Not nice. It'd be better to send these things with git-send-email > > > to simplify the mgmt (like getting them into patchwork for starters) > > > especially in a situation that is bit chaotic to begin with :-/ > > > > It is in patchwork just fine: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9438323/ > > > > git am is unfortunately much more limited than patchwork, but you can > > apply right out of patchwork. > > > > You forgot to add your signed-off-by though. > > > > And this one fixes the sysfs problem > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9438331/ > > > > Here is a commit message: > > > > tpm: Do not call tpm_chip_unregister if register has not succeeded > > > > This is no longer allowed, vtpm was relying on the check inside the > > tpm core which was removed. Fixes an oops during error unwind. > > > > Fixes: a8ed92219a04 ("tpm: Get rid of TPM_CHIP_FLAG_REGISTERED") > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> > > Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > > > That just leaves the ACPI thing.. > > I like the original commit message more. It documents the change.
I added to the commits reviewed-by's and signed-off-by's as I agree on the correctness of the changes. I'll do more formal testing before adding testd-by... /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
