On 05/03/2017 06:38 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:02:15AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: >> The purpose of this series of patches is to enable the passing of the >> locality >> a command is executing in to a TPM emulator. To enable this we introduce a >> new >> flag for the device creation ioctl that requests that the locality be >> prepended >> to every command. For applications to check which flags the driver supports, >> we >> add a new ioctl that returns a bitmask of supported flags. > This is a weird change proposal as you could use tpm_vtpm_proxy for > other than some TPM emulator.
I think in most cases the recipient of the TPM commands from the vtpm_proxy driver will be a TPM emulator. What do you have in mind? > >> v1->v2: >> - fixed return value from function in patch 3/3 >> >> >> Stefan Berger (3): >> tpm: vtpm_proxy: Add ioctl to get supported flags >> tpm: vtpm_proxy: Implement request_locality >> tpm: vtpm_proxy: Add ioctl to request locality prepended to command >> >> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c | 53 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> include/uapi/linux/vtpm_proxy.h | 15 ++++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.4.3 >> > /Jarkko > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-security-module" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel
