On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 07:42:06PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 05/03/2017 06:38 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:02:15AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > The purpose of this series of patches is to enable the passing of the > > > locality > > > a command is executing in to a TPM emulator. To enable this we introduce > > > a new > > > flag for the device creation ioctl that requests that the locality be > > > prepended > > > to every command. For applications to check which flags the driver > > > supports, we > > > add a new ioctl that returns a bitmask of supported flags. > > This is a weird change proposal as you could use tpm_vtpm_proxy for > > other than some TPM emulator. > > I think in most cases the recipient of the TPM commands from the vtpm_proxy > driver will be a TPM emulator. What do you have in mind?
Like using Intel SGX to implement TPM in ring-3. I've thought vtpm_tpm_proxy as generic proxy that you can also use for emulators. /Jarkko ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ tpmdd-devel mailing list tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tpmdd-devel