The argument for registration is to allow repeat reporters and  
commenters to only have to prove their humanity once.

--Noah

On Sep 19, 2006, at 2:12 AM, Christian Boos wrote:

>
> Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
>> I think that despite its huge problems, a CAPTCHA-protected
>> registration system may be a viable option (using in conjunction with
>> SpamFilter). Either that or relax the filters and conscript an army
>> of watchers to delete spam as its submitted.
>
> Not necessarily CAPTCHA for registration, but what about simple CAPTCH
> before POSTing?
> A bit annoying, certainly, but I think it could be effective, as  
> it's in
> use in CVSTrac since ages, and I never noticed spam there [1].
>
> The interface would look like (e.g. for ticket comments):
>
>
> ----
> Add/Change #xxx (...)
> Your email or username:            What is 2 + 2 ?
> _____________________________      _____
>
> Comment (you may use WikiFormatting here):
> --------
> |
> |
> ----
>
>
> There would be also a hash accompanying the POST, in order to prevent
> forged responses.
>
>
> -- Christian
>
> [1] http://www.cvstrac.org/cvstrac/captcha?nxp=/cvstrac/tktnew
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to