Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > Christian Boos wrote: > >> ... as additional tickets _won't_ help right now in this phase. >> <snip> > > Sorry, I've not expressed myself clearly. > > I... I focus on the development-plans on my project. > > During this, I will file some tickets which subject generalization, > targeting the 0.11dev code-base. Unsolved tickets (wontifix, worksforme > etc.) will go as dynapatches into my project. > > Those tickets _could_ help you - or possibly not, but I file them > anyway as the part of my work. >
Right, this is clearer. Please do so, then. > In this context (your work on DataModel/Jounaling etc., my further > work), I like to point to one thread which should be important for > _anyone_ who likes to do serious work on the trac sources, but which > remained unanswered till now: > Well, I think you got no response to that mail because going in the direction of decoupling the core from the subsystems (and eventually insulating those subsystems) was always the plan, I think, but this is something that will eventually happen "naturally", after the setuptools branch is completed. Nobody else feels the need to hurry in that direction, that's why the discussion stalled (or never started). Lack of response is also a response, sometimes ... ... which brings me back to the topic of this thread: guys, I *really* want to start to work on the topics addressed by the initial mail, so just to be clear, I'll interpret lack of response as "I don't care, please do" ;) -- Christian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
