Christian Boos wrote: > Ilias Lazaridis wrote: ... > > In this context (your work on DataModel/Jounaling etc., my further > > work), I like to point to one thread which should be important for > > _anyone_ who likes to do serious work on the trac sources, but which > > remained unanswered till now: > > > > Well, I think you got no response to that mail because going in the > direction of decoupling the core from the subsystems (and eventually > insulating those subsystems) was always the plan, I think, but this is > something that will eventually happen "naturally", after the setuptools > branch is completed. Nobody else feels the need to hurry in that > direction, that's why the discussion stalled (or never started). ...
Many things are natural, but in order to manage the complexity, the team should start to _discuss_ and _document_ and especially _plan_ the tasks, e.g. whilst using a project management tool (which one should the team use?). "Decoupling Core" relates to the task described in this thread, to the sqlalchemy migration, and especially to the workflow branch (which itself relates to the task described in this thread again). short: the planned tasks are interrelated, and should be documented to gain some clarity. PROJECT - Decoupling Core (Framework) from Trac (Application) http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev/browse_thread/thread/094c62b02b2c4b33/# . -- http://dev.lazaridis.com/base --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
