On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:51:54PM +1100, Dave Cole wrote: > > Alec Thomas wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:08:11PM +1100, Dave Cole wrote: > >> We used to use the old workflow branch here for a project we are working > >> on as a joint venture with another company. The old workflow was not > >> able to do all that we wanted, so we have since implemented our desired > > > > I'm not sure why this would be. Everything you describe below, except > > for the additional detail in the milestone view, is doable with a plugin > > for the old Workflow branch. Are you talking about limitations of the > > default configurability? The plugin system? > > In the old workflow you could not assign a new owner to a ticket and > leave the current status intact.
You could achieve this with a plugin, just not with the trac.ini configuration. > In our hack, you can change the owner of a ticket independently of other > workflow related actions. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
