On Thursday 11 January 2007 8:27 am, Alec Thomas wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:23:44AM +0100, Christian Boos wrote: > > the case). Is that branch still in the "don't touch" state? :-) > > No I don't think so. I've come to the realisation that I don't have the > time to hack on something of the magnitude of WorkFlow :(. There are a > few people interested in working on it though, including Dave, and some > mention of doing WorkFlow code at the Trac PyCon sprint, so there seems > to be no shortage of hands :).
And I'm one of them. It doesn't look like I'll be able to put time into it until February, but it's something I'm going to need. Workflow will probably be my focus at the PyCon sprints. > > If not, what could be quite easily done I think and would satisfy 80% of > > the needs, would be to implement the trac.ini configurable part only. > > Doing this by abstracting from the current code and > > http://www.object-craft.com.au/~djc/trac0.11dev.patch shouldn't be that > > hard. > > Hmm, well, maybe. The roadmap code seemed to be the only bit of the > patch useful in the general case. The rest was very specific to Dave's > workflow. The read-only and hidden custom ticket fields look like they would be useful for other plugins too. Eli --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
