On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:03:47PM +0100, Christian Boos wrote: > > A quick follow-up, I've implemented the above ideas in r4556 (which also > finishes the renaming started in r4552). > This also reverted r4551 for the reasons explained in the previous mail.
Excellent. Looks good to me :) > ... and since then, I've discovered Context.from_resource(), which can > perfectly be used instead of the above ;) Aha. I wondered about that... > One thing I'm not totally pleased with is the way you changed the > PermissionCache. Is there any reason for not having a permission > cache at the level of a request? This was a deliberate omission. The caching mechanism was left out while the design was in flux and was to be added later once stabilised. -- Evolution: Taking care of those too stupid to take care of themselves. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
