On 1/14/07, Christian Boos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not really... there's still:* Use setuptools for setup (see [source:sandbox/setuptools]) * ''Refactoring of the Mimeview API (see #3332, [source:sandbox/mimeview])'' * ''Flexible/extensible ticket workflow (see WorkFlow, [source:sandbox/workflow])'' * ''Refactoring of the Wiki Engine to use the Genshi builder API (''experimental'', cboos)'' 1. is really mandatory. 2. is not a big deal, I think 3. is a somewhat bigger deal, agreed 4. likewise, still not started. Not /that/ mandatory for 0.11 but would be nice.
With regards to setuptools, I agree that it needs to be merged first; I just always get confused when there's a notice about a merge (whether it is about merging the branch up to latest trunk or merging the branch *to* the trunk). I agree that the mimeview stuff should also be in there, it seems (though sandbox/mimeview doesn't exist?). It seems to me, though, that the workflow part, while nice, will take to long to finish before 0.11. I have no clue how hard your number 4 is, but it seems like it's not that essential.
Besides those stated broad goals, there are lots of worthy tickets still opened, not to mention those for 0.10.4 ... Not to mention that thanks to the rework of the PermissionPolicy, interesting things are happening in the resource/Context area, which is a kind of "unlocker" for lots of long standing issues ...
Well, alright, but I think now would be a good time to start triaging tickets for 0.11. Pretty much all tickets are now targeted for either 0.10.4 or 0.11, and I think it would be a good time to start moving most of those over to 0.12, except for the ones that are actually viable for 0.11. I also think 0.11 is in a pretty good state right now, and while it may be a little low on user-facing features (Genshi and Pygments are interesting to developers, but not so much for users of the system; WebAdmin was already there, setting your timezone is not that big of a deal for most people, I presume -- but the blame support is pretty cool), I think it would make for a good incremental release kind of thing. Regards, Manuzhai --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
