-On [20070120 13:35], Emmanuel Blot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I think that if we can keep an existing API, at least for a single
>major release, that would be really nice.
Depends on the point of view on the 0.x versioning we have now. Is this
already considered production/stable? If so, perhaps bumping the version
number to 1.0 might be a good move instead of this endless perpetrating 0.x
beta numbering.
>Maybe a warning could be added in the log ('DEBUG' level) when an
>outdated API is still in used by a plugin/macro component, to warn the
>admin that the next upgrade will fail if it does not upgrade this 3rd
>party tool.
That might be useful.
>As a matter of fact, it took me 1 hour to upgrade to Trac 0.11,
This is amazing. How on earth does it take you an hour? In general I need 10
minutes at maximum. :)
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that
something else is more important than fear.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
