On Monday 30 April 2007, Alec Thomas wrote: > > Err, in case this wasn't clear, I'm suggesting we delay the merge > until more people have reviewed it. > > On 5/1/07, Alec Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/1/07, Christian Boos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Eli has put the WorkFlow branch in a good shape, and it has been quite > > > usable for a while now. I've taken a look, tested it and all seems well > > > for me for shifting the work on trunk where it could gain some wider > > > exposure. So I'd like to call a vote for the merge. > > > > > > The ideal situation would be to get a few +1 besides mine and Eli's, > > > till tomorrow afternoon, as it's the 1st of May and I'll have some time > > > to work on the merge together with Eli. But otherwise, it's not a big > > > deal, as I've got plenty of other areas to hack on ;-) > > > > This is not picking on Eli at all, but can we get more review before > > doing major merges? I'd personally like to see at least one of cmlenz, > > jborg or mgood comment on major merges *before* they go in. The more > > people that look at the code the better it will be. Different minds > > pick up different issues.
Agreed. Review is definitely welcome. The problem is it seems to require a threat of merging before it happens. :( > > For my part, I'll look at this tonight (know I've said that before, > > but this time for sure!). Thanks, Eli --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
