On 6/9/07, Alec Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TBH I haven't looked at the workflow yet, but is the implication of
I've now actually looked at it and I have some comments:
- When you have accepted a ticket, the "accept" action is still
available...which does nothing. Perhaps, as a general rule, if the target
state of an action is identical to the current state, the action could be
omitted?
- It now takes three steps to change the resolution of a ticket instead of
the current two: reopen, accept, close. This is a fairly common action on
edgewall.org, and presumably other public Trac installations where end
users close a ticket with an incorrect resolution. Might be nice to have a
"change resolution" action when closed.
- I'd prefer "disown" or "abandon" to "unaccept". Also, the hint text uses
"unowned" which should be "disowned" if we're being consistent about using
verbs to describe the actions being taken.
Also, I retract my -1 and turn it into a +0 ;). If we require an env-upgrade
and print a notice about the change, users won't be surprised and can apply the
old workflow explicitly if they wish.
--
Evolution: Taking care of those too stupid to take care of themselves.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
