On 9/12/07, Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, while most of the docstrings in Trac are pretty much plain text, > there are many that use Wiki formatting, or even the old epydoc format > (mea culpa on that one). I'm not suggesting we go back and change them > all, that can be done slowly and incrementally. But for new docstrings > we should use reST. > > Objections?
None at all, +1. While we're discussing docs, perhaps we should revisit an earlier discussion about fixing the user documentation. We proposed doing exactly what you've done for Genshi: keeping the canonical documentation in svn as restructured text, and exposing it through includes. This of course solves the current problem Trac has of documenting multiple versions. Thoughts? -- Evolution: Taking care of those too stupid to take care of themselves. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
