On Oct 9, 7:17 pm, Christian Boos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Lenz wrote: > > I must say that I'd consider that kind of change/vision outside of > > the scope of even Trac 1.0. ... > > We will need to sort this out *somehow* for the future. Here's what > > *I* want: us to release a 1.0 version sometime in this decade, and > > postpone any big vision shifts until after that point. ... > > What I want is to fix the big problems we still have, for example > > I18n or documentation/help. I don't yet want to think about multi- > > project support, a generic resource system used throughout the code, > > or big changes to the plugin/component system. > > > There's a life after 1.0, if we even ever reach that point. ... > Well, multi-project support has always been a 1.0 goal, for one. > Improved change notification is a topic for 0.12, I think (#1890 and > the like). But we'll have other occasions to talk about all this...
what do you think about adopting a model like git development, who release/tag very often, say every 2 weeks or one month. see http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=tags for their tag history, and here for their branch/merge history: http://repo.or.cz/git-browser/by-commit.html?r=git.git . what version would be called 1.0 should not matter imo, we are using it since one year productive, stable and with great pleasure so nobody would complain about calling 0.10 1.0. and also after 1.0 there may be incompatible changes, thats life that somebody may come up with a better idea how to do something. this would allow trac-users the use of new features immeditately, basically feature by feature - which might be good to attract other people helping out. rupert. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
