Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven kirjoitti:
> -On [20071010 21:18], Emmanuel Blot ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> So, as a short answer to your question ("who would care"), I would and
>> I'm bet (hope?) I'm not the only one.
>
> As an administrator for an ISO 13485 certified company I do care about
> releases and release numbering. The same will probably apply for any
> ITIL-using company:
>
> Any update of the software on the system to a newer version needs to be
> tracked in a change request. Too frequent updates with a mentality to use
> version numbers willy nilly will be a sincere pain in the ass for anybody
> caught in the above.
>
> I am all for releasing a bit more often than the current way, but don't get
> overzealous and use the tiny version number for a simplistic counter for the
> patch-du-jour.
As an extreme case of manufacturing medical devices (that's what that
ISO 13485 is all about, right?). You don't run after every update, don't
use latest stuff and I wild guess is that you just don't pick random
software, start to use it...
I think that main point of this whole discussion is that 0.11
spesifications got a bit out of hands and got that not-so-fancy snowball
effect. And as I have understood this is about to change in the future...
--
Jani Tiainen
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---