-On [20071120 16:17], Christian Boos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Getting to the constructor call style for raising TracError (and other 
>exceptions) was a gradual process, and it might well be that there are 
>still (a few) old-style raise statement. You're welcomed to fix those, 
>but as usual for the i18n branch, please consider making any non-i18n 
>infrastructure related change on trunk /first/, as to avoid possible 
>merge issues.

That's why I raised the issue on the list first, didn't want to get in the way
of any on-going work.

I guess Manu is going to fix this, judging from the other email, if not Manu,
I'll gladly do it. Just let me know.

>Btw, how went that last little merge? ;-)

Only main.py in web/ was a bit more work, otherwise almost no issues.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/
Tonight your soul sleeps, but one day you will feel real pain, maybe
then you will see me as I am: a fragile wreck on a storm of emotion...

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to