This is clearly FUD, and should be ignored as with all such nonsense. No one remembers seeing any requests for help on the ML or IRC channel, so I guess "everything" was a pretty small list of things. Chances are the upgrade being referred to was 0.10.x -> 0.11dev. It was (and still is) a known issue that 0.11 uses more RAM than 0.10 did and early in the development cycle this was reaching truly ridiculous levels, I remember seeing the Trac process on dev.laptop.org getting up to 1 or 2 gigabytes of usage. Since then we have fixed much of this, so the usage is generally pretty close to the 0.10 levels. So again, FUD.
--Noah On May 30, 2008, at 5:41 PM, David Abrahams wrote: > > > I don't want to demoralize anyone, but I thought the devs should know > about this: http://www.initd.org/ > > Sorry if I'm stepping on any toes. > > -- > Dave Abrahams > BoostPro Computing > http://www.boostpro.com > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
