on Fri May 30 2008, Noah Kantrowitz <noah-AT-coderanger.net> wrote:
> This is clearly FUD, and should be ignored as with all such nonsense. I'm not saying you should take this guy seriously, exactly, but it might represent a PR issue you'll need to deal with. > No one remembers seeing any requests for help on the ML or IRC > channel, so I guess "everything" was a pretty small list of things. > Chances are the upgrade being referred to was 0.10.x -> 0.11dev. It > was (and still is) a known issue that 0.11 uses more RAM than 0.10 did > and early in the development cycle this was reaching truly ridiculous > levels, I remember seeing the Trac process on dev.laptop.org getting > up to 1 or 2 gigabytes of usage. Since then we have fixed much of > this, so the usage is generally pretty close to the 0.10 levels. So > again, FUD. IIRC, I'm still seeing growth to impressive sizes (~600M) even with 0.11-rc1. I've been having to restart my trac daily for other reasons (too many pooled DB connections), so I don't know if it continues to grow from there but my impression is that things are still a bit out of control. However, I'm about to fix the DB issue and will be able to get a better read on the memory consumption thereafter. I'll keep you posted. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
