Remy Blank wrote:
> Emmanuel Blot wrote:
>   
>> It would be nice to define the color set easily: the current CSS files
>> requires to tweak the same colors in various locations, which is both
>> error-prone and time-consuming when a new project is to be forked.
>>     
>
> +1
>
> We're probably going to break a lot of customization, though.
> Personally, I'm ok with that.
>
> Would this be a good opportunity to at least start a naming convention
> for CSS classes? I know Google have their classes start with "goog-", we
> could use something like "trac-". This would make integration into an
> existing layout much simpler. I'm not saying we have to change all
> classes to the new convention, but at least apply it to newly defined
> classes.
>
> See:
>
>   http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/5997
>   

And also:
 
  http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/633

-- Christian

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to