On Monday 27 April 2009 11:59:27 am Remy Blank wrote: > Are there any other build configurations you would like to have? I'm not > sure it's worth having all possible combinations of Python version, OS > and database, but maybe some are more sensitive than others.
I think we should have a build configuration for each of them that are commonly used. That means the popular Linux distributions with the versions of python and the databases that ship on those distributions, as well as the other OSes. (Yeah, that's my bias showing. But those "other OSes" are important too.) For Linux, I think we should have the major distributions represented with the versions of python & databases that those distributions ship. CentOS 5 and Debian stable with all three DBs for trunk and 0.11-stable as a minimum. (Yeah, that's 12 combinations right there.) Fedora and Ubuntu with sqlite would be good to have too (for another 4). Make sure we have distributions in there that represent each of the 2.x versions of python we support. OS/X should be represented, but Tim would be able to say what setups are the most common or most reasonable. Windows Vista, Windows XP, with sqlite and mysql? I'm really not sure what is commonly used in that arena. We're going to come up with a large number of combinations... but Trac is widely deployed, and we need to have testing across at least a representative sample. It would probably make sense to figure out what distributions/OSes are well represented in the t.e.o tickets to help us choose. Thoughts? Eli ------------------. "If it ain't broke now, Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram [email protected] `-------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
