On 4/28/09 9:58 AM, John Hampton wrote: > Christian Boos wrote: > <snip> > >> I just have some doubts about the pertinence of adding lots of platform >> nobody uses to *develop* on... > > <snip> > >> Bottom line: don't bother to propose adding a new configuration unless >> you're also volunteering to actively support it. I think that will help >> a lot fighting the combinatorial effect ;-) > > I mostly agree. I think that our main platforms should be those that > the devs use to develop. However, I think that we should actively seek > for volunteers to run build slaves on different configurations. Why > can't we provide a few core build slaves and then have the community > provide the rest?
Hey there, I've been heads down on a deadline since pycon, but wanted to chime in. ActiveState could host a few vm's for automated build/test machines if you need resources. The trac team or selected volunteers would have full access to the vm's. If you're interested let me know, I can find out when they could be available. Regards, Shane --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
