Ok, I'll start tomorrow then. Now it's going to sleep for me first.
The tracdeveloperplugin suddenly doesn't work anymore (I even did a complete
fresh install of genshi and trac and the plugin itself). Crashes with an
IndexError.
File "build/bdist.macosx-10.5-i386/egg/tracdeveloper/log.py", line 64, in fn
first_time = req._tracdeveloper_hdlr.buf[0].created
IndexError: list index out of range
Can this be related to the recent performance patches?
I guess I need to disable it for now.
Regards
Jan Schukat
Christian Boos <[email protected]> schrieb am 24.07.2009 02:27:53:
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> > Hello, if it is ok, I would like to contribute, especially to version 0.12.
> > I'm mostly familiar with the wiki code, so I guess the Rename stuff would
> > be most appropriate for me, especially since I did a little related work in
> > #8453 (something that will never get included and no one but me will
> > probably use).
> >
>
> Great! Your help would be welcome.
>
> > So, if anyone gives me a nod to start doing this, then I'll start. If there
> > is any info that I might need that isn't online ... I mean, there is an
> > existing branch, but that seems to be pretty idle.
> >
>
> Well, it's idle because it's finished ;-) When I was done with that
> branch, the wiki rename feature was working quite well, in a robust way.
>
> There was some negative reactions at the time I proposed it for
> integration into trunk, because some people didn't like the
> `transaction` helper function I mixed in there (note in passing that by
> using such a helper consistently for performing commit/rollback on SQL
> transactions instead of relying on the gc for the eventual rollback, we
> wouldn't have the occasional "current transaction is aborted" error).
>
> So the idea would be to redo the changes on current trunk, minus the
> transaction code if people are still adverse to it (i.e. omitting
> http://trac.edgewall.org/changeset/7333). This means redoing r7334 using
> the current style (with a handle_ta flag), then adapt r7335, r7336,
> r7337, r7738 and r7339 (r7340 and r7941 will be skipped as well). Best
> would be a sequence of cumulative patches for each of the above changes.
>
> Don't hesitate to ask for more details, as you need them.
>
> Depending how well this first phase go, we could even push things a bit
> further (like the batch rename idea in
> http://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/4412#comment:8). But if you're OK with
> that approach, let's focus on the above rebasing and simplifying first.
>
> -- Christian
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
