-On [20090726 11:22], Christian Boos ([email protected]) wrote: >I'm fine with this. At release time, those who grew "big enough" could >be closed and new ones targeting the next release could be created. The >TracTerms* wiki pages could also contain a query listing those >translation tickets. > >e.g. TracTermsFr -> >[[TicketQuery(keywords=~l10n,summary=~fr_FR,group=status,format=table)]]
I am not entirely sure if the TracTerm pages as they are now should continue to exist. They would need some rework to become more of a repository of accepted terminology translations instead under appropriate lockdown instead of the current free for all change. Only then will we maintain a sufficient consistent translation base. >The multirepos feature is not targeted specially at TracMercurial. The >vc backends for svn, darcs (1) and even git (2) also support the >multirepos feature. What I meant was that that URL you gave for 0.12 has an entry for MultiRepos. Under this entry there were some specifics for the Mercurial plugin, which seems to be out of scope for 0.12. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B May God stand between you and harm, in all the empty places where you must walk. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
