> One thing that is becoming cumbersome is supporting backward compatibility 
> with trac notifications.  Specifically, other plugins use the Notification api
> to send their own notifications.  This code has to be reimplemented using the 
> AnnouncerPlugin api since the Notification api is not very extensible.  

So the least we could do is add an extension point allowing to re-route
the calls to the current notification system.

> What do you think?

I'd certainly welcome a more flexible notification system. The plugin
looks quite complex, but very well designed (I haven't looked at the
code yet). Personally, I'm most interested in the "watch this"
functionality, but I'm sure others will find the other features useful
as well.

I only read the wiki page for the plugin, and haven't played with the
plugin yet, but my impression is that the configuration can be quite
complicated. I'm a bit concerned about this, as Trac already seems to be
a challenge in its current state. But maybe this is a wrong impression,
I'll try the plugin to get a better idea.

-- Remy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to