#476: Option to disable CamelCase for non-direct-Wiki pages.
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
 Reporter:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |        Owner:  cboos 
     Type:  enhancement           |       Status:  closed
 Priority:  normal                |    Milestone:  0.9   
Component:  wiki                  |      Version:  devel 
 Severity:  normal                |   Resolution:  fixed 
 Keywords:  CamelCase             |  
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by cboos):

  * keywords:  camelcase => CamelCase
  * milestone:  => 0.9
  * resolution:  => fixed
  * status:  assigned => closed

Comment:

 I agree, this ticket was about the possibility to disable CamelCase
 links because when rendering text which contains lots of CamelCase
 names which are '''not''' meant to be names of Wiki pages, displaying
 them as ''missing links'' makes the whole text hard to read.

 This was addressed in [milestone:0.9], with the option
 {{{
 [wiki]
 ignore_missing_pages = true
 }}}
 which solves __that__ specific problem (the option defaults to `false`,
 though).

 Now, for the problem of wiki formatting in changesets,
 there's been the addition in [milestone:0.10] of yet
 another option:
 {{{
 [changeset]
 wiki_format_messages = false
 }}}
 (defaults to `true`, of course). See #2526.

 In parallel, there will be some additional changes for
 [milestone:0.10] that will make the wiki formatting of
 Changelog-like texts much better by default (see #124).

 To conclude with this, I'll reiterate the suggestion of tim
 that a new ticket should be created if one wants an even greater
 control over what will get wiki formatted or not. But before
 doing that, I'd suggest the author of such a ticket waits for
 the development of [milestone:0.11] to start, and in particular,
 for the WorkFlow branch to be integrated. In fact, the WorkFlow
 branch has already a mechanism in place for deciding whether
 ticket fields should be `.plaintext` or not.
 Currently, it's only about custom fields, but we already
 discussed about extending that mechanism to cover the
 default fields. It should be possible to generalize the approach
 even further. Will see by then.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/ticket/476>
The Trac Project <http://trac.edgewall.com/>
_______________________________________________
Trac-Tickets mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac-tickets

Reply via email to