Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > On a related not, can anyone say if #2611 is still seen with Subversion > 1.4 or not?
I've upgraded subversion to 1.4 and I'm using swig 1.3.27 on a SuSE Linux 10.1 box, no joy, problem persists. The intermittent error still occurs: ... TypeError: argument number 2: a 'apr_pool_t *' is expected, 'instance(<libsvn.core.GenericSWIGWrapper instance at 0xb2b85aac>)' is received I have no idea what to do about this, it's driving me crazy. Anyone? Any ideas? /Lars > --Noah > > Manuzhai wrote: >> On 9/15/06, Rainer Sokoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> if I upgrade subversion to 1.4 and dump/load the repositories to benefit >>> from subversion's new file format - will that affect trac (0.9.6) in any >>> way? >> Trac seems to work just fine for me with Subversion 1.4. But, I am >> running 0.10b1. However, the dump/load cycle doesn't matter; all that >> is hidden from Trac behind Subversion's API. >> >> Regards, >> >> Manuzhai >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
