Jim Nanney wrote: > On 9/26/06, Noah Kantrowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Neither trac-users nor trac-dev are high-traffic enough that I think it > > is a problem. > > > > --Noah > > +1 here. > > Since joining the mailing lists in July (July 21) there are 48 threads > on trac-dev, 4 that deal with plugins and macros. Hardly enough for a > split in my opinion.
you (all of you) can ignore the argumentation-line, the rationales and even the statements of existent developers (which relay me essentially to an non-existen group). Trac will become more popular, and it's time to prepare the project by providing consistent resources. At the minimum, the documentation should be upgraded to make concise statements about where to post: http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/MailingList (even if it's finally inconsistent). . --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
