I think most of us who answer a lot of questions are on both lists, and it makes no difference to me personally which list they ask on. I would with Sid that a plugin usage question should probably go to trac-users, and a plugin development should go to trac-dev, but if not, oh well. Its really not a big deal IMO.
--Noah Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > Jim Nanney wrote: >> On 9/26/06, Noah Kantrowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Neither trac-users nor trac-dev are high-traffic enough that I think it >>> is a problem. >>> >>> --Noah >> +1 here. >> >> Since joining the mailing lists in July (July 21) there are 48 threads >> on trac-dev, 4 that deal with plugins and macros. Hardly enough for a >> split in my opinion. > > you (all of you) can ignore the argumentation-line, the rationales and > even the statements of existent developers (which relay me essentially > to an non-existen group). > > Trac will become more popular, and it's time to prepare the project by > providing consistent resources. > > At the minimum, the documentation should be upgraded to make concise > statements about where to post: > > http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/MailingList > > (even if it's finally inconsistent). > > . > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
