Forgive the side question...
Is tracforge feature complete? I was under the impression it was still in development. Greg On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 09:54 -0400, Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > > On Sep 28, 2006, at 9:36 AM, zwetan wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Things like getting a unified look and feel would get annoying very > >> quickly. I'm not sure what you think cannot be done from within Trac, > >> because I haven't yet found anything. TracForge only needs to provide > >> the project (read: env) management tools for this, as there are a > >> rich set of plugins for configuring each env, and I see no reason to > >> duplicate this. > >> > > > > well for unified look > > I will just modify 1 template in the main Trac > > to add a navbar on the top that's all nothing more > > > > and after the goal is that each user being able > > to edit their own trac.ini to configure their logo, etc... > > but as it would not be secure to let them access > > directly the trac.ini file > > hence a web admin is needed to do that > > See also Alec's wonderful IniAdmin plugin. > > > > > the goal is to be able to serve ~100 Trac which could have > > all different settings per user need > > - not the same user rights > > - not the same SVN hooks > > - not the same backup process > > etc. > > Considering that Trac has no inherent scaling issues (aside from > SQLite, which is unavoidable) that I know of, I don't see why this > needs to be out-of-band. TracForge already provides for both global > permissions/roles, and local ones. > > > > > sure trac can handle user rights from the admin > > but from Trac you can not define SVN hooks, or you need to make a > > plugin > > from Trac you can not run backup of the Trac db and the SVN repo, > > another Trac plugin > > Of course it can. Just run a bunch of select * queries, and build out > a new schema design from that, then send the rendered schema (using > the DatabaseManager's to_sql() results) and the rendered inserts back > to the browser. For Subversion you would probably need to call > svnadmin dump and capture the output (trivial using the subprocess > module). > > > > > all those kind of automation process can be done from shell script, > > or best from a web admin running the shell script > > > > but perharps I see all that too much from a host admin point of view > > > > zwetan > > > > > > > > > > > -- Greg Dickie just a guy Maximum Throughput --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
