Good grief!
I don't think there is yet a `trac-nit-pick` list, but please start one and move these types of comments to it. Your emails sound very much condescending - as if you know the `proper` way to manage a project and the trac project needs to conform. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ilias Lazaridis Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:48 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Trac] Re: GROUP - Feedback for "dev" tagged Trac Versions Noah Kantrowitz wrote: > Ilias Lazaridis wrote: >> Shouldn't feedback for 0.11dev go into the trac-devel group? >> >> Thus keeping trac-users 'clean' for users of stable versions? > > Like with other discussions about this, is anyone actually bothered by > messages going to one group instead of the other? Like with other discussions about 'this': This is about _basic_ project organization. This is really so basic and essential that I've really difficulties to argue about this. . -- http://lazaridis.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
