Pelton, Brian wrote: > On Behalf Of Ilias Lazaridis ... >> Like with other discussions about 'this': >> >> This is about _basic_ project organization. >> >> This is really so basic and essential that I've really difficulties to >> argue about this. > > Good grief! > > I don't think there is yet a `trac-nit-pick` list, but > please start one and move these types of comments to it.
this would actually be "trac-infra", "trac-base", trac-foundation or similar. But the trac project isn't large enouth for such a group. > Your emails sound very much condescending - as if you > know the `proper` way to manage a project and > the trac project needs to conform. There's really not much to know about content-seperation. The trac project should of course conform to such standards. E.g.: a developer who likes to teach-into trac should not be forces to search within a user-group for development related topics. You see, it's a matter of gentleness. . --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
