On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:59:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > But anyway, I would love to see such an improvement for trac. And I > think most of the functionality is already there. My requirements ;-) > would be: > > * Ability to freeze the state of all requirements at the time of the > release for this specific context > * Every requirement should have a customizeable set of "sections", e.g. > a "testplan" or "manufacturing instructions" > * Ability to automatically generate a complete testplan for all > requirements at the time of the release > * Tabular overview with short description for all requirements > * manual assignment of a requirement number to fit old existent numberings > * Talking about testplans: Each test could be a specialized form on > itself, that is linked to the requirement. > * Ability to link ticket, requirements and testplans
Did you try workflow (http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/sandbox/pycon/workflow)? Rainer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
