solo turn wrote: > i guess part of the reason is the version control system. with > mercurial, darcs or git it is much easier to cherry pick (or > transplant in mercurial terms) and apply change sets, or manage > branches. > > if mercurial has a proper "rebase" like git, or git is as fast on > windows as on linux, it could be an idea to switch away from > subversion. or just use darcs if codebase is not too large. > > then one could have a release branch with genshi in it, one with > genshi and workflow and so on. cboos tries it with subversion, and i'm > still wondering (or should i say admiring) how well it works despite > this tool ... > > -solo >
Perhaps this is a question best discussed on the SVN list, but I'm wondering what exactly are you saying the shortcomings of SVN are? From what I understand SVN makes it pretty easy to create release branches, so I'm not quite sure I follow. Russ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
