On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 01:00:48PM -0700, Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Thomas Moschny
> > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:48 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Trac] Re: Merge wiki pages - not a collision solution
> > 
> > 
> > 2008/6/2, Noah Kantrowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Check both into subversion and use that (or git, hg, etc). A wiki is
> > not
> > > designed for that kind of complex document management.
> > 
> > <rant>Well, if Trac stored the wiki contents within the repository
> > [1], it could even support such 'complex' tasks. Ikiwiki [2] does
> > that, for example, even in a distributed way.</rant>
> > 
> 
> I said quite clearly that this is an option, and that we have opted to not
> do it this way for a number of important reasons. These are detailed in the
> link I gave. If you want a subversion-backed wiki, use a subversion-backed
> wiki, I don't see why this is a problem. Trac doesn't have to fill every
> possible niche ever :P
> 
> --Noah

For what its worth from a first time mailer to this list, I am glad trac does 
not import its wiki pages into an svn repo by default.  For my mileage, this 
would be clunkier (but I'm sure I have different wiki needs than others).

Jeff

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac 
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to