> There is not much "building" as it's a python project. It's basically > installing a bunch of eggs. You are right that we haven't tried it on > Windows. But we would love to get a Windows expert to give it a try.
<snip> Thanks. I was referring to the "extra" tools in Oforge, seemed like them might need to be built for windows. could of been wrong on that. Thanks for the tip on the redirect. I may just give OForge a go just to see what might be involved in making it work on a Windows server (bleh). That said, I am no Windows expert. As a matter of fact, I have been told on numerous occasions I don't know bleep about anything. that could just be the wife though :D I did give the bitnami stack a try, seems to work. Not sure I want to bother with that either, was a good proof of concept. but I need 0.11 of trac, and would "like" python 2.5 not sure if it's easier to upgrade, or just re-install from source. BTW, I forgot to ask, if install OForge, will I get the standard trac look and feel, or yours? I don't like "re-branding" a bunch of stuff other people did, even when the effort and additions to make it all work together were entirely genuine. Bothered me a bit about the Bitnami stack, the default page for apache is the BitNami thing. That said, i would have to point my apache server to the correct place anyway. So it's a convienient place holder for me to put a cross project dashboard instead :D Thanks for the OForge efforts, btw, and also putting up with my blathering dumb questions. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
