On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Noah Kantrowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 29, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Jeff Hammel wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:18:30PM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 29, 6:24 pm, Jeff Hammel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> The idea occured to me to setup a trac with bounties for plugin >>>> and other development work similar to RequestAHacks on trac-hacks >>>> but for paid work. While I'd love to do this...probably not right >>>> now as I don't have much free development time (although I could >>>> be persuaded). >>>> >> >> I'd love to hear what thoughts others have had on this idea. > > My general thoughts: > 1. Bounty-based only, no bidding.
+1 for bidding IMO > 2. Must state desired license up-front. FOSS is preferred, but not > required. +1 ... even if I think that should remain being FOSS ... a broader audience will be captured otherwise ... ;) > 3. Support is separate, ticket bounties are for the request only. -1 ... all reqs at once ... if both parties agree, deal is closed ... > 4. Neither the Trac nor Trac-Hacks team will involve themselves in > disputes. ok ... but ... > Any deal is made between the two parties only. > -100 ^ 2 ... this doesn't work ... it there *MUST* be very clear rules and arbitration process ... otherwise it's barely useful ... safety is a *MUST*, at least IMO ... -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: Comandos : Pipe Viewer ... ¿Qué está pasando por esta tubería? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
