On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 3:48 PM, yoheeb <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Basically because I dont wnat to pay licences for MS Project, >> > especially since I cannot know what it's doing or even modify it the >> > way I want, or ... is it open source already? >> I mean, data availabilty for third party systems should be a >> requirement since the very beginning, and that would allow what you >> are mentioning above ;) >> >> Didnt I include that in the wiki ? Pls, feel free to add it ;o) >> > Um, not sure what you mean, but between rss, xmlrpc, the report > system, and custom plugins and things like TracGViz or whatever, it > already IS available, and has been. (not to mentioun good 'ole http) >
What I mean is that if data needs to be available so that an external system can do whatever with it ... That's fine ... Being either «rss, xmlrpc, the report system, and custom plugins and things like TracGViz or whatever, ». Nonetheless, I am not sure about whether a PMS accept RSS so as to get the data needed to render a Gantt chart. Therefore if there is a std format to exchange that data, that's cool, and that should be included in the plugin (the only formats that come to my mind know so far are GViz protocol & something like the one used for calendars, but they are as specific as I'd like to ;). > That said: >>>"Basically because I dont wnat to pay licences for MS Project," > > is a bad reason to jam it into trac. I am not saying putting it into > Trac is a bad idea, I don't want to poo-poo the endeavor, just seems > like there are MANY project management tools out there that could be > leveraged and it is a TON of work. Oh yes ! good point ! ... > So you don't like/want project, > how about TaskJuggler, OpenWorkbench, dotProject or.....the list goes > on, those are just 3 that are open source. ... that's why I already tried the latest (dotProject) & Redmine ;o) > I would guess there are > dozens more, > You 'r right. If we can reuse something. Let's be it ! Does any of those includes a JavaScript | Flash-based widget so that you can supply the data? Yes? Can we use it ? +1 for reusing all that ;o) > and possibly some other proprietary ones worth the look. not interested, for evident reasons ;o) > thought it might be worth considering. For us, projects consist of > way more than just the code, so pm tools need to cover many other > things that don't readily fit in trac so the "import the software > specific crap into your other big unweildy tool" model is nice due to > the decoupling. > What about my enterprise having trac and other Trac-based web apps, wishing to have Gantts and Pert charts plus others? > anyway, again, good luck, if my observations are irrelevant, please > feel free to label me a heretic and ignore them :D Nooo they 'r just cool : Where were you when we were burned and broken ? While the days slipped by from our wiki writing ;o) -- Regards, Olemis. Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/ Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/ Featured article: Microsoft Magic bugs : ¿Por qué utilizar software libre? - http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/simelo-es/~3/cXNYovsJJ5s/microsoft-magic-bugs-por-que-utilizar.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
