On Oct 10, 4:45 am, "Cooke, Mark" <[email protected]> wrote: > [Note: the convention is to reply _below_ the text, so it can be read in > order. See below..] > > > > > > > On Oct 8, 4:04 pm, ray <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I would like to detemie what to use for SVN and DB for the Trac > > > installation. > > > > I have found this list of SVN sources: > > > .CollabNet (supported and certified by CollabNet; requires > > > registration) > > > .SlikSVN (32- and 64-bit client MSI; maintained by Bert Huijben, > > > SharpSvn project) > > > .VisualSVN Server (Subversion server installer and > > management console; > > > maintained by VisualSVN) > > > .WANdisco (supported and certified by WANdisco; requires > > registration) > > > .Win32Svn (32-bit client, server and bindings, MSI and ZIPs; > > > maintained by David Darj) > > > > I would ask this question on the SVN forum but I am more > > interested in > > > Trac user's view points. I would like to hear comments and concerns > > > on these and any other sources if they exist. This will be on a > > > Windows box accessible over the corp network and possibly internet. > > > Additionally, we have some Visual Studio users that may want to use > > > the SVN repository or maybe not. I would really like to hear > > > concerns. > > > > Trac needs a DB. I believe it comes with SQLlite but can > > use others. > > > What would drive the choice? The Visual Studio users use SQL but I > > > don't know if that has any relation. One other app uses PostgreSQL. > > > I don't know if use of other DB would drive the choice for > > what to use > > > with Trac. > > > > Thanks, > > > ray > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] On Behalf Of ray > > Sent: 08 October 2011 22:16 > > To: Trac Users > > Subject: [Trac] Re: New Installation - SVN and DB > > > I do not know if Subclipse is an option for Trac. We have a couple > > users of Eclipse but they are not using a version control app. Is > > there a way to share Subclipse with Trac? What are the > > considerations? > > > Thanks, > > ray > > "Subclipse" is just a client. Trac needs access to the repository itself, so > the simple answer is "No, subclipse is not an option" > > FYI, my choice when I setup Trac and subversion here was to use vanilla > subversion binaries (I use alagazam.net but you need somewhere that will give > you python bindings too), latest 2.2 apache httpd, PostgreSQL (plus python > bindings) and mod_wsgi. These all work well plus we use mod_ldap to > authenticate against Active Directory. > > As the Trac dB and subversion repository files are (should be!) hidden from > all users (except the server apache user) it does not really matter what your > clients use... > > Does that help? > > ~ mark c- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
Mark, Thank you. That was very informative. I am still not sure as to what the drivers are for choosing what DB to use for Trac. What are the trade-offs between SQLlight and the others? ray - I do not see how to hide quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
